School Counseling Assessment Dashboard
The School Counseling Dashboard contains systematic program evaluation data as well as the aggregate assessment of student learning outcomes.
The assessment plan utilized by the Counseling Program includes multiple points throughout a student鈥檚 Plan of Study where assessment occurs; the means by which assessment occurs; the assessment measures and formats utilized; process by which remediation occurs as needed; and the means by which data is collected, analyzed, and utilized for curriculum and program improvement.
The assessment dashboard provides an opportunity for our stakeholders to review our assessment plan as well as the results of data collection and evaluation process. Data points on the assessment dashboard are updated as new data becomes available.
Between Fall 2018 and Summer 2019, there were 21 graduates of 歐聯積分榜's school counseling program degree track. Our graduates have achieved a 100% pass rate on the Praxis exam for the past two years.
Between Fall 2018 and Summer 2019, 68 students were enrolled in the school counseling program degree track. Of the total number enrolled, 64 were female, 4 were male, and 0 were of undisclosed gender. Of those students enrolled, 1 identified as meeting the qualification for students with disabilities. 50 students identified ass Caucasian, 6 African-American, 8 Latinx, 0 Asian, 1 biracial or other.
Admissions Report
| Effectiveness Area | Direct Data |
| Academic Year | |
| Applications Started* | 25 |
| Applications Completed | 25 |
| Applications Denied | 1 |
| Applications Accepted | 24 |
| Students Admitted | 21 |
Academic Year 2018, G17M with CSCN
| Effectiveness Area | Benchmark | Direct Data |
| Year | 2018 | |
| Enrollment* | Goal of the number of students admitted to the school counseling program for the academic year | 15 enrolled |
| Retention** | Benchmark was at 75% | 95% |
| Graduation*** | Benchmark was at 50% | 67% |
| Attrition | Benchmark was below 50% | 5% |
| Course Completion Rates**** | Benchmark was at or above 90% | 97.8% |
*Enrollment: number enrolled on census day (fall, spring & summer, student counted once for academic year)
**Retention=first graduate term was in AY2017; re-enrolled in AY2018
***Graduation=graduated in 3 years or less based on plan of study
****Course completion rates: excludes appointment courses
Academic Year 2019, G17M with CSCN
| Effectiveness Area | Benchmark | Direct Data |
| Year | 2019 | |
| Enrollment* | Goal of the number of students admitted to the school counseling program for the academic year | 27 enrolled |
| Retention** | Benchmark was at 75% | 100% |
| Graduation*** | Benchmark was at 50% | 80% |
| Attrition | Benchmark was below 50% | 0% |
| Course Completion Rates**** | Benchmark was at or above 90% | 100% |
*Enrollment: Number enrolled on census day (Fall, Spring & Summer, student counted once for academic year)
**Retention: First graduate term was in Academic Year 2018; re-enrolled in Academic Year 2019
***Graduation: Graduated in 3 years or less based on plan of study
****Course completion rates: Excludes appointment courses
| Student Remidiation Plan Data Area | 2018 | 2019 |
| Number of Remediation Plans | 1 | 0 |
| Percentage of Students Enrolled | 1% | 0% |
| Percentage who complied with or were in the process of compying with Remediation Plan Requirements | 0% | 0% |
| Percentage who chose not to comply with Remediation Plan Requirements | 0% | 0% |
Below data was collected from our previous assessment software and they did not cover all KLO assessments. However, this will be a new data point that will be implemented starting from Fall 2019 to Summer 2020. The SC assessment report for fall 2019 to summer 2020 will likely be available for review upon site visit.
| Name of Assessment | Standards Assessed | Transition Point | Conceptual Framework Proficiency/Disposition | CAEP / InTASC Standard | N (or score count) | % Pass1 |
| 1. Praxis Test | 1-10 | IV | PR, CTA, CKS, C | A.1.1 | 13 | 100% |
|
2.School Guidance Project |
2, 7 | III | HDD, CTA, C, dc | A.2.2 | 13 | 100% |
| 3.Practicum Evaluation | 1-8 | III | PR, HDD, CTA, CKS, T, C, dl, df | A.2.2 | 4 | 100% |
| 4.Case Study | 1, 3, 4, 8 | III | PR, HDD, CTA, CKS | A.2.2 | 4 | 100% |
|
5a. CESP 822: Assessment in Counseling |
5 | III | CTA | A.1.3 | 11 | 100% |
|
5b. CESP 810: Introduction to Ed Research |
5 | II | CKS | A.1.2 | 36 | 97.2% |
|
5c. CESP 815: Career Development |
5 | III | CKS | A.1.4 | 16 | 100% |
|
5d. CESP 821 Multicultural Issues in Counseling |
5 | III | CKS | A.1.1 | 34 | 100% |
|
6.Comprehensive Exam (CPCE) |
1-10 | IV | PR, CTA, CKS, dl | A.1.1 | 13 | 100% |
|
7.Counseling Foundations Final |
1 | II | PR, dl | A.1.1 | 23 | 100% |
| Fall 2018 |
歐聯積分榜 University |
Overall | |||
| Section | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| C1: Human Growth and Development | 11.5 | 2.4 | 11.5 | 2.7 | |
C2: Social and Cultural Diversity |
10.6 | 2.3 | 10.1 | 2.5 | |
| C3: Helping Relationships |
10.9 | 2.1 | 12.2 | 2.6 | |
| C4: Group Work | 11.0 | 3.0 | 11.1 | 2.6 | |
| C5: Career Development | 8.3 | 1.8 | 9.4 | 2.7 | |
| C6: Assessment | 10.3 | 2.1 | 10.8 | 2.3 | |
| C7: Research and Program Evaluation | 9.9 | 3.5 | 11.1 | 3.1 | |
| C8: Professional Orientation and Ethical Practice | 8.3 | 3.1 | 11.3 | 2.8 | |
| Total | 80.6 | 16.8 | 87.6 | 16.3 | |
| Spring 2019 |
歐聯積分榜 University |
Overall | |||
| Section | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| C1: Human Growth and Development | 12.0 | 5.3 | 12.6 | 2.6 | |
C2: Social and Cultural Diversity |
10.7 | 3.1 | 11.5 | 2.2 | |
| C3: Helping Relationships |
14.0 | 1.0 | 13.8 | 1.6 | |
| C4: Group Work | 14.0 | 1.0 | 12.9 | 1.7 | |
| C5: Career Development | 9.3 | 1.5 | 10.3 | 2.0 | |
| C6: Assessment | 9.3 | 1.5 | 10.4 | 2.4 | |
| C7: Research and Program Evaluation | 12.0 | 0.0 | 12.1 | 2.0 | |
| C8: Professional Orientation and Ethical Practice | 11.3 | 1.2 | 12.1 | 1.6 | |
| Total | 92.7 | 11.0 | 95.6 | 7.9 | |
| Summer 2019 |
歐聯積分榜 University |
Overall | |||
| Section | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| C1: Human Growth and Development | 10.0 | 1.4 | 9.1 | 2.5 | |
C2: Social and Cultural Diversity |
8.0 | 0.0 | 9.3 | 1.8 | |
| C3: Helping Relationships |
13.0 | 1.4 | 10.2 | 2.3 | |
| C4: Group Work | 11.5 | 0.7 | 9.6 | 2.5 | |
| C5: Career Development | 13.5 | 2.1 | 10.1 | 2.3 | |
| C6: Assessment | 11.5 | 2.1 | 10.1 | 2.3 | |
| C7: Research and Program Evaluation | 10.0 | 1.4 | 10.1 | 2.4 | |
| C8: Professional Orientation and Ethical Practice | 14.5 | 2.1 | 10.8 | 2.2 | |
| Total | 92.0 | 4.2 | 79.3 | 12.2 | |
| Category | Mean % Correct | % of Candidates Above 25th % |
| I. Foundations | 78.5 | 84.6% |
| II. Delivery of Services | 81.0 | 92.3% |
| III. Management | 71.2 | 76.9% |
| IV. Acountability | 74.4 | 76.9% |
27 counseling alumni responded to this survey in 2019. Below is a brief description of the survey.
- 96.4% reported that the counseling program prepared them to understand counseling processes, theories, and models.
- 100% reported that the counseling program prepared them with the ability to effectively apply the basic skills of counseling.
- 100% reported that the counseling program helped them develop a strong sense of professional identity and commitment to the counseling profession.
- 96.4% reported that the counseling program prepared them to recognize, assess and intervene in suicide risk situations.
- 96.4% reported that the counseling program adequately prepared them in human growth and development.
- 92.9% reported that the counseling program adequately prepared them in social and cultural foundations.
- 92.9% reported that the counseling program adequately prepared them in helping relationships.
- 搂 82.1% reported that the counseling program adequately prepared them in group counseling.
- 96.4% reported that the counseling program adequately prepared them in career and lifestyle development.
- 96.4% reported that the counseling program adequately prepared them in assessment instruments and methods.
- 92.9% reported that the counseling program adequately prepared them in research and program evaluation.
- 96.4% reported that the counseling program adequately prepared them in professional orientation and ethics.
29 employers responded to this survey in 2019. Below is a brief description of the survey.
- 96.2% reported that their employees understood and applied concepts of human development across the cognitive, social and emotional areas.
- 96.2% reported that their employees understood and applied concepts of individual differences and diverse cultures and communities in a professional setting.
- 93.1% reported that their employees understood and applied concepts of assessment in order to guide their professional decision making
- 93.1% reported that their employees understood and applied ethical practices in maintaining confidentiality of student or client information.
- 96.2% reported that their employees understood counseling processes, theories, and models.
- 96.2% or above reported that their employees had the ability to accept constructive feedback from supervisor.
- 96% or above reported that their employees had the ability to facilitate groups.
- 96.2% or above reported that their employees had knowledge of community resources and the ability to determine appropriate referrals.
| Practicum | Fall 2018 | Spring 2019 | Summer 2019 |
| Candidacy Application | 2 | 10 | N/A |
| Candidacy Denied | 0 | 0 | N/A |
| Candidacy Endorsed | 2 | 10 | N/A |
| Internship | Fall 2018 | Spring 2019 | Summer 2019 |
| Candidacy Application | 18 | 9 | N/A |
| Candidacy Denied | 0 | 0 | N/A |
| Candidacy Endorsed | 18 | 9 | N/A |
| Fall 2018 - School Counseling | ||
| Campus-Based Courses | Online Courses | |
| Credits Offered | 45 | 9 |
| University Defined / Average Teaching Load | 7.85 | 9.67 |
| Faculty FTE | 5.73 | 0.93 |
| Student Credit Hours Produced | 294 | 126 |
| Unviersity Defined Full-Time Student | 9 | 9 |
| Student FTE | 32.67 | 14 |
| FTE Ratio | 5.7 | 15.05 |
| Core Faculty Hours | 33 | 9 |
| Core Faculty % Hours | 73% | 100% |
| Non-Core Faculty Hours | 3 | 0 |
| Non-Core Faculty % Hours | 7% | 0% |
| Adjunct Hours | 9 | 0 |
| Adjunct % Hours | 20% | 0% |
| Note: Adjunct*: 3-hour teaching load; Department Head**: 6 hours; Core Faculty/Non-Core Faculty: 9 hours; Clinical Faculty***: 12 hours | ||
| Sping 2019 - School Counseling | ||
| Campus-Based Courses | Online Courses | |
| Credits Offered | 30 | 9 |
| University Defined / Average Teaching Load | 7.67 | 9 |
| Faculty FTE | 3.91 | 1 |
| Student Credit Hours Produced | 198 | 99 |
| Unviersity Defined Full-Time Student | 9 | 9 |
| Student FTE | 22 | 11 |
| FTE Ratio | 5.63 | 11 |
| Core Faculty Hours | 24 | 6 |
| Core Faculty % Hours | 80% | 67% |
| Non-Core Faculty Hours | 0 | 3 |
| Non-Core Faculty % Hours | 0% | 33% |
| Adjunct Hours | 6 | 0 |
| Adjunct % Hours | 20% | 0% |
| Note: Adjunct*: 3-hour teaching load; Department Head**: 6 hours; Core Faculty/Non-Core Faculty: 9 hours; Clinical Faculty***: 12 hours | ||
| Summer 2019 - School Counseling | ||
| Campus-Based Courses | Online Courses | |
| Credits Offered | 6 | 12 |
| University Defined / Average Teaching Load | 9 | 9.75 |
| Faculty FTE | .67 | 1.23 |
| Student Credit Hours Produced | 45 | 186 |
| Unviersity Defined Full-Time Student | 9 | 9 |
| Student FTE | 5 | 20.67 |
| FTE Ratio | 7.46 | 16.8 |
| Core Faculty Hours | 6 | 9 |
| Core Faculty % Hours | 100% | 75% |
| Non-Core Faculty Hours | 0 | 3 |
| Non-Core Faculty % Hours | 0% | 25% |
| Adjunct Hours | 0 | 0 |
| Adjunct % Hours | 0% | 0% |
| Note: Adjunct*: 3-hour teaching load; Department Head**: 6 hours; Core Faculty/Non-Core Faculty: 9 hours; Clinical Faculty***: 12 hours | ||